Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

Film Rant - Where Bad Movies Get The Respect They Deserve.

INCEPTION: THE MUSIC

August 15th 2010 07:28
INCEPTION: THE MUSIC

Written and Directed by Christopher Nolan

Article from stuff.co.nz

Having systematically picked apart the critical arguments for and against Christopher Nolan's Inception and the many possible meanings of that dream-within-a-dream-within-a -dream caper, the film's fans on the web have gone deeper by focusing on its music.

A video by a pseudonymous author, camiam321, comparing the Edith Piaf song Non, Je Ne Regrette Rien to Hans Zimmer's score for the movie has circulated widely on the internet. It plays a key musical cue from the Inception score - two ominous blares from a brass section - followed by a slowed version of the Piaf song (which the Inception characters play at regular speed as a warning to wake up from a dream state). They sound nearly identical.


Zimmer, who won an Academy Award for his music for The Lion King, said the sonic similarity was not only intentional but it was an element of an enigmatic film ''that wasn't supposed to be a secret''.

The musical cue, Zimmer said, ''was our big signpost'' to show the film's characters moving from one level of dreaming (or reality) into another. ''It was like a drawing of a huge finger saying, 'OK, different time'.''

Zimmer said the idea for this musical game began with Nolan, the film's director and writer. ''He had the Edith Piaf always written in the script, the da-da, da-da,'' Zimmer said, imitating the cadence of that song. ''It was like huge foghorns over a city, and afterward you would maybe figure out that they were related.''

Technically, Zimmer said, that part of his score was not a slowing of Non, Je Ne Regrette Rien, but was constructed from a single manipulated beat from the version recorded by Piaf in 1960. ''I had to go and extract these two notes out of a recording,'' he said. ''I love technology, so it was a lot of fun for me to go and get the original master out of the French national archives. And then find some crazy scientist in France who would actually go and take that one cell out of the DNA.''


The manipulated beat comprises about five minutes of Zimmer's 132-minute score, but all its tempos, he said, are ''subdivisions and multiplications of the tempo of the Edith Piaf track''.

In this sense the score is Zimmer's personal interpretation of Inception, which many viewers see as a commentary on the nebulous boundary between dreaming and reality.

''Everybody thinks the dream is the important part,'' Zimmer said. ''For me the time was the important part: the idea that, in a peculiar way, Chris had made a time-travel movie that actually worked.''

Watch camiam321's video here


51
Vote
   


INCEPTION: THE SPOILER EDITION

August 8th 2010 01:29
INCEPTION: THE SPOILER EDITION

Written & Directed by Christopher Nolan

Inception makes you think. The ending is not so much a twist, as something that you can discuss and debate with other filmgoers afterwards. The beauty of the film is that the ending can be seen two different ways, and the narrative has been constructed by Christopher Nolan specifically to give clues both for, and against, Cobb still being in a dream-state at the end. These are some useful arguments that I have found on message boards, and on various comments after reviews posted online. If there are any plot inaccuracies, that is because I have left the argument from the original poster unchanged.

As someone stated on a message board: “Nolan was the architect; the movie was his dream. The audience was sharing his dream. With the top in the end, kept spinning and not exactly shown to the audience the outcome [sic], the inception is practiced. You will choose your own idea about the outcome and it will grow like a virus in you to the point you will watch the movie again and again only to see that your view holds together. Yet, the movie is actually open for many interpretations if you ask me. In this case he chose not to show you the top falling down. Thus the idea is implemented.”


On why at the end of Inception Cobb is not still dreaming:

1) In all scenes believed to be reality throughout the movie, Cobb is definitely not wearing a wedding ring. In all dreams, Cobb is wearing the wedding ring. Nolan clearly set it up consistently so that dreams = ring, reality = no ring. At the end he does not have a ring. The rule that Nolan set is no ring = reality.

2) The children are wearing different clothing at the end. To this point, I have focused only on the differences in the girl’s clothing. The girl is wearing a solid pink dress in the dreams. In the ending scene (reality) she is wearing a pink dress with a white t-shirt underneath. Nolan purposely makes the outfits ultra-similar so it will create the idea for nay-sayers to claim it was a dream. But if you look closely you will notice they are different.
Inception
Inception poster image 1
3) The children are bigger and older at the end. The end credits list two children playing the girl, and two playing the boy. Their voices are older sounding in the end as well.

4) Cobb refuses to look at his children in the dreams, saying that "if I will ever see their faces again, I have to get home, to the real world." He stated that he will not give up until he sees their faces in the real world. He knows he can see them in the dream world, but he states that he will not do it until it is real.

5) The top goes from perfectly spinning, to wobbling slightly, to wobbling a lot, which implies it should fall next. I know should does not mean it will, but in previous dreams the top never wobbles like that, it goes smoothly non-stop.

6) Remember the scene in the outdoor cafe in which Cobb tells Ariadne that in dreams it always seems that we are "dropped" into the action and that we can never remember the "beginning" or "how we got there"? Admittedly, the last scene is very dream-like - the warm lighting, the children wearing similar clothes and playing in the exact same position - but does Cobb just "show up"? Not at all. In fact, the preceding couple of minutes to this last scene are visually the most banal and non-dream like: Cobb wakes up on the plane. Cobb waits in line. Cobb goes through immigration. There's that extended shot of Cobb and his team and Fischer waiting for luggage at baggage claim (how exciting). Then Cobb sees his father in law, who is there to pick him up and take him home.

What's the point of Nolan showing all these banal, everyday aspects of airport routine? To show there is a logical, normal, decidedly non-dreamlike process to how Cobb ended up at home seeing his children. The ending is real, and you could argue it has nothing to do with whatever ends up happening to the top. There's no faceless corporate boogeymen, no walls closing in, no Mal popping around, no staircases that end in other staircases: it's a plane at touchdown, an immigrations check, a baggage claim shot, a guy waiting to pick up his son in law at the airport. So the audience knows - and Cobb knows - "how he got" to his children at the end. That would not happen in a dream.


On why at the end of Inception Cobb is still dreaming:

1) Cobb is still dreaming. This explains why the movie starts off with him meeting Old Saito, since neither we, nor Cobb, know how he gets there before this. This scene abruptly changes to him trying to steal from a memory from Young Saito, and while we do not question what came before this, it is quite possible that nothing came before this.

2) Cobb explains that you can think faster while dreaming than you can while awake, which is totally legit, and explains why you can have an hour's time pass in a 5 minute dream. But that does not explain why you'd experience time faster while dreaming within a dream. In fact, his explanation makes the phenomenon of compounded time increasing for dreams within dreams impossible. Your brain would not feed any faster on its own thoughts in a dream just because you are dreaming that you are dreaming.

3) Cobb and his wife are seen together walking as an old couple, but when they kill themselves on the train track they are young. Cobb explains that you do not notice the things that are strange about a dream until you wake up, but it is certainly strange that they would go from being old to dying young.
Inception
Inception poster image 2

4) Old Saito’s limbo beach is identical to Cobb's limbo beach, and his kids are playing on the beach in the beginning of the movie. You could say that they are in limbo together. But if you are saying that Cobb is still in limbo, then maybe they are all just figments of his imagination/sub-conscious, and it looks like Cobb's limbo because it is Cobb's limbo.

5) Cobb's wife says that she knows that they are not her kids, that a mother can tell, and then she jumps from the window across from Cobb. How does she get there? Surely forensics would be able to tell that she jumped from the room across from theirs, rather than being thrown out of her window. And yet, in a dream, that would not matter. I think that, like Cobb's wife, Cobb cannot try to have a real relationship with his kids or parents, since he would eventually recognize that they are not real, which explains the line from his wife at the end: "what seems more likely, trying to run from superpower multi-national corporations, trying to get back to your family.”

6) Cobb is the only one that does not have a totem. Cobb says the way best way to distinguish between reality and dreams is to make a totem. Yet Cobb does not make one. Cobb’s totem is borrowed from Mal. It is her old totem. The top was Mal's. Mal died in the dream, returning to reality, and Cobb takes the top to use as his totem.

7) And even if it belongs to Cobb, it only tells whether the owner is in someone else’s dream, as the other person cannot copy a particular totem without having touched it. It does not tell whether the owner him/herself is still dreaming: a perplexing situation which a man faces while he is in limbo.

8) If Cobb is still dreaming, then he never actually touched the totem in real life. Also, he was in a shared dream with the person whose totem he took. There is no way that the top can be used to prove or disprove reality at any point in the film.

9) If Cobb is still dreaming, and this is all in Cobb’s head then there are two possibilities:

His wife wakes up by killing herself in the dream, but he does not. He creates this idea that he incepted the idea of "this world is not real" in his wife's mind so that she would wake up. Perhaps the reality is that she woke up, and he is rationalizing his existence in Limbo by identifying himself as the origin of that idea to confirm that this is reality and that his wife was wrong in killing herself.

Second is that he is in Limbo by himself. Who knows if inception, extraction or even dream sharing is possible. Maybe he is just in a coma and his brain is active but he cannot wake up. He dreams of his wife and kids, but those dreams cannot last because, as he says, they are just a shade of his real life. So his brain creates this dream reality to explain why he cannot see his kids, nor wife, and when things do not make sense, it is because he is in a dream, and then he imagines himself waking up from that dream, while still dreaming. Mal cannot appear in Cobb's "reality state" because he cannot create a convincing version of her. He knows her too well to fool himself with a "shade" of her. Cobb spends most of his time in the movie with people who he barely knows. Cobb is externalizing his own experiences into a fictional (or dream version of) persons or people. The person who gets the most screen time that Cobb should know the best is Joseph Gordon-Levitt/Arthur, and yet he has the least character development of anyone in the movie.

An interesting point is that if you started the movie again from the very first scene right after the very last scene in the film, the movie would still make sense. Seems he's stuck in a loop chasing after a real version of his wife and kids, but does not know that he is dreaming, or how to wake up.

81
Vote
   


INCEPTION

July 28th 2010 09:17
INCEPTION (2010)

Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Ken Watanabe, Ellen Page, Marion Cotillard, Tom Hardy, Cillian Murphy, Michael Caine, Pete Postlethwaite, Tom Berenger.

Written & Directed by Christopher Nolan.

Leonardo DiCaprio plays a man haunted by visions of his dead wife, and unsure if the reality around him is real or not; no, I am not talking about Shutter Island, I am talking about the other major DiCaprio vehicle for this year, Christopher Nolan’s Inception.

Inception falls into the mind-bender genre, yet, incredibly, it is almost spoiler proof. I could tell you how it ends, but it would not mean anything to you unless you had experienced what has gone before. Rather like The Matrix, with which it shares some similarities, no one can be told what Inception is; you have to see it for yourself.

Part mission-impossible, part action film, Inception follows a team of people whose job it is to steal corporate secrets. They do this by inducing sleep in the victim, who is plugged in via a machine to the rest of the team, who are also asleep. They then share the same, constructed dream, only the victim does not know that they are dreaming. The victim is then encouraged to reveal their secrets through the subconscious world of their dreams. The dream has to convince completely, otherwise they will wake, or, the person’s subconscious projections will start to attack the intruders within the dream. The inception of the title comes from the team being asked, at the behest of Saito (Ken Watanabe), to plant an idea in the mind of fortune heir Robert Fischer (Cillian Murphy), rather than to steal one.

Leonardo DiCaprio plays Cobb, who has been dealing in dream espionage for a while. He has been on the run from authorities because they believe he was involved with the death of his wife, Mal (Marion Cotillard). He has been separated from his children, and his goal is to see them again. He is assisted in his work by Arthur (Joseph Gordon-Levitt), and they recruit Eames (an excellent Tom Ward) as their forger for the new assignment. Our introduction to the world of dream-weaving comes in the form of Ariadne (Ellen Page), as we learn all about their business through her eyes. She must become their new dream architect, whose job it is to construct the layout of the dream, hence the cool scene where she folds a city in on itself. Each dreamer must have a totem, she is told. Something they can hold that lets them know for certain whether or not they are dreaming. Leonardo’s is the guilt over his wife’s death but he also uses another totem, a spinning top, which has important repercussions later.

The brilliance of Inception is that it makes you think, while being an entertaining action film. Especially of note is the fight scene in the spinning corridor, followed by the zero-gravity sequence. It just looks cool. The pacing is tight, and, despite being over two hours, never feels long. It is a testament to the respect Nolan generates as a director that so many name actors have shown up to work for him in what are essentially cameo roles (Michael Caine, Pete Postlethwaite). If I have one complaint, it is that the chase sequence in the snow goes on for a little too long, and it is difficult to tell who is fighting whom in the snow, as the characters are all dressed the same. But that is a minor quibble.

When not making intelligent comic book films, Nolan chooses to make films in one of my favourite genres, the mind-bender. Following on from the ground-breaking backwards story of Memento, and the magician mystery, The Prestige, Inception explores more of Nolan’s preoccupations, exploring the very nature of what a filmmaker does within an intelligent, and action-focussed narrative. Just as The Prestige covered the way a filmmaker is like a magician, distracting us with awe-inspiring tricks and sleight of hand, all the while concealing from us the deception at hand until the very end, when they bask in the prestige of the trick they have managed to pull off. So does Inception explore the filmmaker’s ability to create a world so real for the viewer, much like a dream, that we believe it is real while we are in it. The way a film is constructed also bears a similarity to dream logic; cutting from one setting to another, without showing how the characters get there, much like the a smooth edit in a film.

With Inception Nolan has managed to pull off the feat of an intelligent, action film that is exciting, multi-layered and thought-provoking. Perhaps his greatest achievement are the ideas that he manages to plant in the minds of his audience.
108
Vote
   



Friday the 13th (reboot 2009) vs. A Nightmare on Elm Street (reboot 2010)

[ Click here to read more ]
88
Vote
   


SHUTTER ISLAND

April 5th 2010 08:28
Shutter Island (2010)

Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Mark Ruffalo, Ben Kingsley, Michelle Williams, Emily Mortimer.

[ Click here to read more ]
109
Vote
   


ALICE IN WONDERLAND (2010)

March 18th 2010 06:38
ALICE IN WONDERLAND (2010)
Starring: Johnny Depp, Mia Wasikowska, Helena Bonham Carter, Anne Hathaway, Crispin Glover.
Directed by: Tim Burton

[ Click here to read more ]
45
Vote
   


SILENT RUNNING VS. MOON

January 10th 2010 07:15
Silent Running (1972) vs. Moon (2009)
Silent Running: Starring: Bruce Dern
Directed by: Douglas Trumbull

[ Click here to read more ]
61
Vote
   


REPO! THE GENETIC OPERA

January 3rd 2010 06:00
REPO! THE GENETIC OPERA (2008)

Starring: Alexa Vega, Anthony Stewart Head, Sarah Brightman, Paris Hilton, Paul Sorvino,Terrance Zdunich.

[ Click here to read more ]
37
Vote
   


WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE

December 6th 2009 08:02
Where the Wild Things Are

Starring: Max Records, Catherine Keener, James Gandolfini, Paul Dano, Lauren Ambrose

[ Click here to read more ]
61
Vote
   


THE IMAGINARIUM OF DOCTOR PARNASSUS

November 15th 2009 10:14
The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus

Starring: Christopher Plummer, Lily Cole, Tom Waits, Heath Ledger, Andrew Garfield, Johnny Depp, Jude Law, Colin Farrell.

[ Click here to read more ]
62
Vote
   


More Posts
2 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
72 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Susannah's Blogs

0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
Moderated by Susannah
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]