Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login

I SAW THE DEVIL

March 25th 2012 04:02
I Saw the Devil (2010)

Starring: Byung-hun Lee, Min-sik Choi.

Directed by: Jee-woon Kim

I Saw the Devil is a violent South Korean revenge thriller from director Jee-woon Kim. Rated R18 in New Zealand, this film is difficult to stomach as evidenced by a walkout at the screening I attended, after a particularly violent opening sequence. However, the subject matter should give anyone curious about this film an indication that it won't be an easy or pleasant watch. It is about a man's continual revenge on the serial killer who murdered his wife. The murder of his wife occurs in the reasonably gruesome opening sequence as a seemingly kindly man (Min-sik Choi from Chan-wook Park’s Old Boy) offers to help a young woman stranded in her broken down car in the snow. We feel uneasy at his persistence in trying to help her, and wisely, she refuses help from a stranger. But he bashes his way into her car by smashing the widescreen and belting her on the head. Then we cut to her back at his serial killer den, naked, and lying on a concrete floor. She begs him to spare her life, telling him that she is pregnant. He proceeds to kill her anyway, dismembering the body and (with gruesome sound effects) disembowelling her as well. The cave-like den has a ledge with a convenient outlet to water, allowing the blood to be easily washed away. Her body parts then show up in the river, and a police hunt is launched to recover all the parts. There is a blackly comic sequence involving the discovery of the head. All of this is only the first twenty minutes of the film!


I Saw the Devil poster
I Saw the Devil poster



Her husband Kim Soo-hyeon (Byung-hun Lee) is devastated, as is her father, a police officer of some twenty years. Who, despite being a cop, despairs that he could not even keep his own daughter safe. Her husband does not know how to deal with her loss. He blames himself for not being there - his job takes him away a lot - and when he is given the details of the chief suspects in her death by his father-in-law, resolves upon revenge, telling his workplace that he will only need two weeks bereavement leave. Systemically, he finds and interrogates the suspects, until he locates (mid sexual assault no less) the guilty one, Kyung-chul (Min-sik Choi). But he does not just want revenge once. No. He wants it over and over and over again.

Korean, devil, revenge
Contemplating revenge


Thus begins the plot of a revenge film which features a load of violence and unpleasantries. Nearly every female in the film is victimised or attacked in some way. Never has so much violence again women been graphically committed to celluloid since The Killer Inside Me by Michael Winterbottom. But there is violence against men too. The serial killer, Kyung-chul despatches, very violently, two men in a car, who, the film implies, are killers and robbers themselves. He is repeatedly beaten up by the husband, including one wince-inducing scene where his Achilles heel tendon is cut. The serial killer himself, once relieved of his day job (driving a high school van!) goes on a violence and sexual assault rampage; intimidating and attacking nearly everyone he meets, including the doctor and nurse who give him medical treatment. His odyssey includes visiting an old serial killer friend, and his female companion, who have taken over a boarding house. His friend has become a cannibal, and has a freezer full of body parts (Like I said, not an easy watch). When discussing who his pursuer might be, serial killer two says to one that the husband has become one of them because he has been overtaken by violence. But the interesting thing is that the husband never loses his humanity, nor does he suffer the fate of purgation that anti-heroes of film noir often succumb to: their lives being forfeit once they have taken one themselves. He punishes, but he is never seen to kill. He never stoops to the level of Kyung-chul. He is himself plagued by the question of why someone would ever commit the crimes that Kyung-chul has. The motivations of the killer are something he will never understand.

Min-sik Choi as Kyung-chul
Min-sik Choi as Kyung-chul


As the villain, Min-sik Choi delivers a performance of equal standard to that of his victim role in Chan-wook Park’s Old Boy, only this time playing the perpetrator. He delivers rough, craggy-looking charm, which easily morphs into empty-eyed, pitiless malice that sees his victims as nothing more than things to kill. He is positively chilling in his cold-bloodedness, and once the gloves come off when he has been fired from his job, there is not even the comfort of the pretence of charm and humanity towards his victims. The audience is uncomfortably aware of exactly what lies in wait for his many victims and there is nothing to do but wait and see if Kyung-chul will be stopped in time by his tormentor.

Min-sik Choi as Kyung-chul
Min-sik Choi as Kyung-chul


Byung-hun Lee is also excellent as the bereaved husband Kim Soo-hyeon. Despite what he does to Kyung-chul, and to the other killers in the film, he never loses his humanity by becoming the very thing he is trying to stop. It turns out that his job is actually that of a special agent, not incredible when you know South Korea is neighbours with North Korea, and his training and access to technology allows him to easily track and subdue this vicious killer. It is like a very dark chapter of Tom Cruise's Mission Impossible. Despite the horrificness of Kyung-chul’s actions the film never offers judgement on the characters in the way Hollywood revenge films often do. Although you root for Kim Soo-hyeon's revenge at points, the film does show it coming at a very high price. Many people die along the way, or get injured, including his wife's own family, who could have been spared had the agent stopped him outright, or allowed the police to catch him: police who, throughout the film, seem to be very incompetent. But Kim Soo-hyeon's motivation for continuing this revenge is that it gives him a focus, a way of delaying the intense grief that he must confront over his wife's senseless death. By distracting himself with a self assigned mission, he can delay the inevitable fact that he will have to face that his wife is never coming back.

Byung-hun Lee as Kim Soo-hyeon
Byung-hun Lee as Kim Soo-hyeon


Jee-woon Kim directs with a cool, impartial eye, depicting events but never pushing the audience to judge the characters one way or another. Whether or not you approve of Kim Soo-hyeon's revenge is up to you. At times his visual styling is reminiscent of David Lynch. Especially the highway lines at the start. The ending is in keeping with the film, but the final scene where Kim Soo-hyeon unleashes all of his heartbreak and agony shows that revenge, no matter how satisfying, cannot take pain away. “Does revenge ever solve anything?” is the lingering question.

Byung-hun Lee as Kim Soo-hyeon
Byung-hun Lee as Kim Soo-hyeon




25
Vote
   


HUGO

January 23rd 2012 04:50
Hugo (2011)

Starring: Asa Butterfield, Chloe Grace Moretz, Ben Kingsley, Sacha Baron Cohen, Christopher Lee, Jude Law, Emily Mortimer.

Directed by: Martin Scorsese

I must admit I was surprised to learn that Martin Scorsese was directing a film for children. But I quickly realised that it was actually a perfect fit, as Hugo is Scorsese’s love letter to the birth of cinema. Based on the award winning novel The Invention of Hugo Cabret by Brian Selznick, Hugo is set mainly in the Gare Montparnase train station in 1930s Paris. Orphaned after his father (Jude Law) dies, and then taken in by his uncle who works in the train station, Hugo (Asa Butterfield) lives within it walls, tending to the maintenance of the many clocks of the train station each day. He does this alone as his uncle has abandoned him. His only companion is an automaton, a clock-work man, which, once repaired, will write what Hugo believes will be a message for his father. Hugo is determined to get it fixed as it was the last thing his father, a clockmaker, was working on before he died.

Hugo poster
Hugo poster


steampunk Hugo
A steampunker's dream


But Hugo does not have all the parts he needs to get the automaton working. To this end he has been stealing wind-up toys from the toy booth at the train station. One day he is caught by the toy-booth owner, Georges Melies (Ben Kingsley), who takes his notebook with drawings of the automaton in it, and threatens to report him to the very vigilant Station Inspector (Sacha Baron Cohen) if he does it again. When Melies threatens to burn the notebook, Hugo befriends Isabelle (Chloe Grace Moretz), Melies’ ward, and begs her to stop him from burning it. They strike up a friendship, and Hugo learns that Melies forbids Isabelle to see films.

Automaton
Hugo and Isabelle with the automaton


Having read The Invention of Hugo Cabret I can say that Scorsese has captured the spirit of the book. Selznick’s work is unusual in that his novel is actually only one third text. The rest of the story is told visually by Selznick’s illustrations. The perfect novel to adapt for such a visual storyteller as Scorsese and Hugo is a masterpiece of visual storytelling: evident from the brilliant opening shot of the clockwork turning into the streets of Paris, which then becomes a zoom through the streets of Paris, through the train station, right up to the face of a clock out of which peeks Hugo’s eye. Hugo is Scorsese’s first film in 3D, and boy has he mastered it; so much so that he puts other 3D filmmakers to shame. Hugo is the best use of 3D cinema that you will see. Unlike a lot of filmmakers who just have things fly at the camera, Scorsese has realised the power of 3D to increase the depth of field of the image. Not only does the picture reach out to the audience, but at the same time things will be happening in the background that will make the image stretch on forever, giving amazing depth and scope to the locations, such as corridors in the train station and Hugo climbing the tower inside the clock. He even uses it for comical effect, such as when Sacha Baron Cohen’s Station Inspector looms into a close up declaring a character to be offended by another character’s “visage” while filling the screen with his frightful, heavy-browed expression. Scorsese is so mindful of the use of 3D that he even makes sure that things that are not 3D in real life are still 2D within the 3D footage, such as the sketches and drawings by the automaton and by Melies.

library
Hugo in the film library


Scorsese breaks from his usual mould in other ways too by having strong comical, almost farcical, aspects, and by working with children as leads. Both aspects work brilliantly well. As the over-zealous Station Inspector, Cohen is both the antagonist and the comic relief. Obsessed with ridding the train station of all thieving, orphaned children, he has rung up the police officer to collect children to send to the orphanage so many times that they have become friends over the phone, and there is a running gag about the paternity of the policeman’s child. The Inspector is hindered by a comical leg brace, and constantly accompanied by his dog. Scorsese allows Cohen to make much of the encumbrance of the leg brace, which jams, locking his knee in place at inappropriate times, and preventing him from running, including one early sequence where he chooses to collide, not with an enormous fancy cake, but with a band, entangling himself in a cello. A lot is made of the Inspector’s close relationship with his dog, and many shots also link them visually, often drawing a visual comparison between the long face of the dog, and Cohen’s long face. But the Inspector is not just there for laughs; his injury is revealed to be caused by World War One, and he has tentative feelings for the florist (Emily Mortimer) in the station, to whom he struggles to strike up the courage to speak.

Sacha Baron Cohen
Sacha Baron Cohen as the Station Inspector


Scorsese coaxes excellent performances from his two leads, Moretz and Butterfiled, who hold their own against older, more experienced co-stars. The film is largely dominated by them and their burgeoning friendship. Moretz is an appealing presence, with a cheeky smile, whose character has a running gag about using big words. As Hugo, Butterfield really anchors the film, providing the heart and soul of the story with his sensitive performance, conveying his journey from a lonely, heart-broken boy, to someone who finds a place for himself in the world. His large, emotive eyes draw you in and tug on your heart strings, and physically he is reminiscent of Elijah Wood as a child actor.

Hugo and Isabelle
Hugo and Isabelle


It is no surprise that Georges Melies (Ben Kinglsey) turns out to be the filmmaker Melies who made the now legendary A Trip to the Moon, Or Voyage to the Moon, in 1902. The real Melies did end up working as a toy maker after World War One ended his film career. Considered the “father of special effects” the real Melies was a pioneer of fantasy films, making over 500 in his career. This is where Scorsese’s homage to cinema comes in. Together Hugo and Isabelle discover that her godfather is actually a filmmaker. So heartbroken was he over his filmmaking coming to an end that he denies his cinema history, until the children ensure he gets the recognition he deserves. And so does Scorsese, lovingly recreating scenes from Melies’ early fantasy short films, and imagining him as actor, writer and director in flashbacks. Much is also made throughout the film of the power of cinema to bring dreams to life and to make them reality. Scorsese also recreates the famous screening of the Lumiere brothers first film, that of the train entering the station, where the audience fled from their seats because they were afraid they were going to get hit! Hugo is astonished when Isabelle tells him she has never seen a film, and insists on sneaking her into a cinema to watch one. Hugo also recounts how his father had amazing memories of seeing A Trip to the Moon at the cinema for the first time. They also meet a film professor, Rene Tabard, whose love of film was born from seeing Melies’ films as a child.

Hugo Melies
Hugo and Melies in the toyshop


Scorsese has created a wonderful, moving family film that celebrates the power of people to help and to heal. This is marred perfectly with a celebration of the birth of cinema and its ability to bring dreams to life. It is also one of the best book adaptations I have ever seen, while also being one of the most striking visual films, not to mention the best ever use of 3D, and all in service to the story. Scorsese has created a film of the book which ought to make the author, Brian Selznick, very proud. You will regret it if you don’t see Hugo at the movies.

If you like this review then it!
25
Vote
   


Rise of the Planet of the Apes

December 2nd 2011 10:54
RISE OF THE PLANET OF THE APES (2011)

Starring: Andy Serkis, James Franco, John Lithgow, Freida Pinto, Tom Felton.

Directed by: Rupert Wyatt.

The Rise of the Planet of the Apes may be a cumbersome film title, but it is far from a bloated action film. Instead it offers a lean, emotionally engaging tale in which story, and the journey of Caesar’s character, takes precedence.

Eyes of Caesar
The green irises of Caesar


James Franco plays a promising young scientist, Will Rodman, who is desperate to gain funding for human trials for a brain-cell regenerating serum which he has been testing on chimps. Far from a megalomaniacal scientist, the personal reasons for his developing the drug become clear as his father, Charles (John Lithgow) is revealed to be suffering from Alzheimer’s disease.

James Franco as Will Rodman
James Franco as Will Rodman


Invited to present his research to the company board, it all goes horribly wrong when his prize test subject runs amok. All funding for the drug research is cut, dashing his hopes. However, Will discovers that the chimp had been pregnant, and did not act-out from aggressive side-effects, but from a desire to protect her baby chimp to whom she had recently given birth. Smuggling the baby out of the lab, he raises the chimp at home. Christened Caesar after Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar, Will discovers that he exhibits intelligence far beyond that of other chimps, and also, that his IQ is beyond that of his human counterparts. Thus the effects of the intelligence serum were passed on from mother to unborn son, and so can be transmitted genetically. Caesar learns to sign and understands Will's voice commands. Caesar also has distinctive green irises, a side effect of the intelligence serum.

Caesar in the sanctuary
Caesar in the sanctuary


For a while everything goes incredibly well. Caesar, Will and Charles live together happily. Seeing that the drug works, Will gives it to his father, whose intelligence comes back, and Will meets Caroline (Freida Pinto), a veterinarian who loves chimps. Unfortunately, it does not last, and Charles' body begins to build up a resistance to the serum, causing him to regress. It is when defending Charles from a confrontation with a bothersome neighbour, after Charles suffers a confused episode in a car, that Caesar is perceived as dangerous. He is taken away to a chimp sanctuary which appears to be run by an indifferent owner and his sadistic son (Tom Felton, not breaking the Draco Malfoy mould). Caesar has always perceived that he is different from humans, but after his separation from his "father" he realises that he will never be accepted by humans. But he has never interacted with other chimps before, and feels separated from them too.

Tom Felton
Tom Felton as the sadistic sanctuary keeper


Andy Serkis' performance as Caesar is simply amazing. The digital effects are astonishing for all the apes (gorilla, orang-utan), but what Serkis is able to convey emotionally, and the sympathy he elicits for Caesar, is as real as if a person is on screen. I challenge anyone not to have their eyes mist up when Caesar draws his window in chalk on his cell wall, pretending that he is once again at home, and that he hears the laughter of the children next door. Serkis also conveys Caesar's transition from exuberant youth, to steely commander of a rebellious band of apes, extremely well.

Caesar
Caesar holding onto Charles


Franco, Pinto and Lithgow all manage to give good support, in spite of this being Serkis' show. As Will, Franco does not demonstrate any far-fetched action-man heroics, and his affection for Caesar is honest and palpable. Lithgow is sympathetic and convincing as the Alzheimer’s afflicted father. Pinto, while she does not get to do a great deal, is understanding of Will's predicament, and is spared the usual role in action films of the girlfriend bitching at the hero for all his bad decisions.

Franco & Pinto
Caroline and Will look worried


As Caesar learns to fit in with his fellow chimpanzees, and, in another plot development, is able to increase their intelligence too by giving them the intelligence serum, he chooses to stay with his own kind and emerges as their leader. But unlike what the trailer implies, this is not an ape overthrow of humanity, but rather, that humanity's tampering with animals creates a group who simply seek their independence from the oppressive and cruel human rule in their enclosure. Humans are the villains because they persecute what they do not understand and see the apes as a threat, when their goal is simply to have their own home. The ending also strongly implies that the intelligence serum has created a virus that may bring about the end of humanity on earth - paving the way for a sequel perhaps?

Caesar on the bridge
Caesar leads his army


This also fits in very nicely with the established world of the many ‘Apes films made in the 70s. There are several clever allusions to those films, including footage of George Taylor’s (Charlton Heston) astronaut being interviewed on television regarding the first manned mission to Mars, and a subsequent headline that the mission was lost in space. Also, Caesar is shown building a model of the Statue of Liberty, but only getting as far as the head and shoulders…

Caesar looks serious
Caesar looks serious


Rise of the Planet of the Apes is an intelligent, engaging film that focuses strongly on character, storyline and on maintaining the internal logic of the film. There will always be holes to pick in the plotting of any sci-fi, but the storywriters make a valiant effort at clearly accounting for each plot development. The action, when it comes, is exciting and refrains from over-editing and confusing, bombastic sequences that ruin many other blockbuster films. Rise of the Planet of the Apes is definitely worth a watch.

If you like this review then it!

25
Vote
   


BRAM STOKER'S DRACULA

September 28th 2011 08:45
Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992)

Starring: Gary Oldman, Winona Ryder, Anthony Hopkins, Keanu Reeves, Sadie Frost, Tom Waits.

[ Click here to read more ]
17
Vote
   


The Deer Hunter VS Full Metal Jacket

August 21st 2011 08:59
The Deer Hunter (1978) versus Full Metal Jacket (1987)

Starring: Robert De Niro, Christopher Walken, Meryl Streep, John Cazale, John Savage.

[ Click here to read more ]
17
Vote
   


FESTIVAL OF CRAZY CAGE

June 19th 2011 01:30
Festival of Crazy Cage

Nicolas Cage is known for his energetic, over-the-top performances, and, lately, terrible film choices. Here we take a look at some choice performances from Cage’s career so far. Starting with the original Crazy Cage film, Vampire’s Kiss, known for Cage’s eating the cockroach for real (for 3 takes!), followed by the much maligned remake of The Wicker Man, and concluding with the reimagining of Bad Lieutenant under the direction of notorious and obsessive director Werner Herzog. Here are my Crazy Cage film choices followed by a Crazy Cage rating. My rating goes all the way up to 11.

[ Click here to read more ]
30
Vote
   


SOURCE CODE

June 6th 2011 07:17
SOURCE CODE (2011)

Starring: Jake Gyllenhaal, Michelle Monaghan, Vera Farmiga, Jeffrey Wright.

[ Click here to read more ]
30
Vote
   


Horror Comedy Challenge: TUCKER & DALE VS EVIL (2010) vs RUBBER (2010)

Tucker & Dale vs Evil (2010)

[ Click here to read more ]
22
Vote
   


THE KILLER INSIDE ME

April 11th 2011 06:39
THE KILLER INSIDE ME (2010)

Starring: Casey Affleck, Jessica Alba, Kate Hudson, Ned Beatty, Simon Baker.

[ Click here to read more ]
22
Vote
   


THE ADJUSTMENT BUREAU

March 27th 2011 06:05
The Adjustment Bureau (2011)

Starring: Matt Damon, Emily Blunt, Anthony Mackie, John Slattery, Terence Stamp.

[ Click here to read more ]
32
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
91 Posts dating from August 2006
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Susannah's Blogs

0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
0 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
0 Post(s)
Moderated by Susannah
Copyright © 2012 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]